#POWERPC MAC OS X EMULATOR SOFTWARE#
#POWERPC MAC OS X EMULATOR PC#

Rosetta 1 decodes sequences of PowerPC instructions and generates an equivalent sequence of Intel instructions, which are then executed by the Intel processor. In addition, the question in your thread title suggests that you misunderstand what Rosetta does.

#POWERPC MAC OS X EMULATOR SOFTWARE#

It does not provide a way to run an entire Intel operating system in a virtual machine, and cannot be used to assist virtual machine software to run Intel code inside a virtual machine. Rosetta 2 has nothing to do with this: it provides code translation to run Intel processes on an Apple Silicon Mac under the host macOS.

#POWERPC MAC OS X EMULATOR PC#

This would be similar in concept to products like Virtual PC (from Connectix, later bought by Microsoft) which emulated an Intel PC down to the processor instructions, and allowed running DOS or Windows on a PowerPC Mac. The best way this could be achieved would be if someone released a product which went beyond virtualisation and also emulated an Intel processor.

Therefore with the initial release of VMware Fusion for Apple Silicon Macs, there will not be any way to run old PowerPC-only applications like Eudora and Palm Desktop. Those will not work under the expected initial release of VMware Fusion for Apple Silicon Macs. To run PowerPC applications under Rosetta, you would need to be able to run the Intel versions of Mac OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard Server or Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard Server in a VM. For example, this would allow running ARM-based Linux variants, or macOS Big Sur in virtualisation on an Apple Silicon Mac.В This will not extend to running older macOS versions (macOS Catalina 10.15 or earlier), since they are Intel operating systems. When VMware Fusion is released for Apple Silicon Macs, the expectation is that it will initially allow virtualisation of ARM-based operating systems. Ever.The short answer: no to scenario 1, and scenario 2 is not applicable or relevant. Having said all that, if by some miracle they can actually get this emulator to run just as well as running it on a native box, and Apple lets them do itВ…well then, that's whole different ball game. I don't know how all that works, but I've got to believe Apple would crush this product like a grape if push comes to shove. But I just can't believe there is enough interest in, say, making sure the web page looks right on the Mac, to suport such a product.ДЄnother reason is licensing. Admittedly, multi-platform testing is a very legitimate use of an emulator. Kepp in mind, we Mac users typically run VPC because we HAVE to, not because we want to. Additionally, those apps tend to be for users that actually make money with them, therefore they can easily justify the expense of buying a real Mac. But you're not going to want to emulate those things. Yes, there are really compelling products/software these days for the Mac exclusively (Final Cut, iLife series, Motion, Shake, etc.). The other reason this will never go anywhere is that there simply is no demand for this product. Or watch their video card give the emulator's OpenGL fits. To add an emulator on top of that can only mean trouble.ДЇor example, I want to see someone use Toast via the emulator on an uber-cheap CD burner. PC users are still plagued with major headaches for such things. Apple has complete control over such things, so it's fairly easy for them to virtually guarantee compliance and operability. The main reason being that the hardware peripheral support wil be totally out of whack (video cards, media drives, etc.).

Powerpc mac os x emulator